Likely False· StrongPseudoscience
the earth is flat
The claim that the Earth is flat is decisively contradicted by all available scientific evidence. Geodesy, satellite observations, climate modeling, and direct imaging confirm Earth is an oblate spheroid.
Largest vulnerability: Moderate uncertainty — risk of bias is the main limit: 100% of evidence is opinion/anecdote-tier.
Sources (25)
- Nature Physics · peer_reviewed · 2018-02-09 · credibility 95%
- link.springer.com · peer_reviewed · 2008-11-07 · credibility 95%
- link.springer.com · peer_reviewed · 2009-01-08 · credibility 95%
- link.springer.com · peer_reviewed · credibility 95%
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · peer_reviewed · credibility 95%
- pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · peer_reviewed · credibility 95%
- Cognitive Psychology · peer_reviewed · 1992-10-01 · credibility 90%
- link.springer.com · peer_reviewed · 2025-02-12 · credibility 90%
- link.springer.com · peer_reviewed · 2019-02-18 · credibility 90%
- link.springer.com · peer_reviewed · credibility 90%
- pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov · peer_reviewed · credibility 90%
- arxiv.org · peer_reviewed · 2008-12-20 · credibility 85%
- Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · peer_reviewed · 2022-05-18 · credibility 85%
- arxiv.org · peer_reviewed · credibility 80%
- link.springer.com · peer_reviewed · credibility 80%
- link.springer.com · peer_reviewed · credibility 80%
- link.springer.com · peer_reviewed · credibility 80%
- link.springer.com · peer_reviewed · credibility 80%
- ar5iv.labs.arxiv.org · peer_reviewed · credibility 75%
- mdpi.com · peer_reviewed · 2024-03-25 · credibility 75%
- arxiv.org · peer_reviewed · credibility 70%
- Astronomy and Astrophysics · report · 2016-09-15 · credibility 50%
- SIAM Review · report · 1968-10-01 · credibility 50%
- Reviews of Modern Physics · report · 2003-04-22 · credibility 50%
- Journal of Physical Oceanography · report · 1998-03-01 · credibility 50%
The competing caseWe evaluated the competing case, and here is why it did not hold.
Competing claims we weighed
- The Earth appears flat at human scales and local observations, suggesting flat-Earth models may better reflect everyday lived experience than abstract spheroid mathematics.
- Geodetic measurements and satellite-derived Earth radius figures contain inherent uncertainties and model-dependent assumptions, meaning the precise shape of the Earth cannot be definitively established.
- Satellite images of a spherical Earth are composites or computer-generated models produced by space agencies, and therefore cannot serve as direct observational proof of Earth's shape.
- Climate models that assume a spherical Earth introduce systematic biases, implying the spherical assumption is a modelling convenience rather than a confirmed physical reality.
Epistry weighs the case for and against — see the full breakdown, including the opposing evidence and why it held or failed, in the app.